El Paso Matters – Q&A: City Council District 1 candidates in Dec. 14 runoff election

Who’s running for this seat?

Candidate Questionnaires

Candidates were asked to limit their responses to 100 words. Responses have been lightly edited for grammar.

What is your vision for the city of El Paso for the next 10 years and what needs to be done to get there?

Alejandra “Ale” Chávez: My vision for El Paso is a city where every individual can work, live and thrive. Over the next 10 years, I see El Paso becoming a hub for innovation, attracting businesses with competitive wages while maintaining our cultural strength. By expanding the commercial tax base, investing in infrastructure, and promoting responsible growth, we can ensure a high quality of life and keep El Paso affordable for all. Together, we can share our story and build a bright future.

Monica Reyes: My vision is of a thriving city, marked by economic growth, sustainability, and an enhanced quality of life. A modernized infrastructure supports innovation, education and workforce development. The focus is on fiscal responsibility, reducing non-essential spending and fostering small businesses. We will attract new industries, expand public transportation, build binational collaboration, and retain local talent through education, training and mentorship initiatives.

The city of El Paso since 2004 has had a council-manager form of government, limiting the mayor’s power. In the past year, the city manager’s authority over auditing and other functions has been removed. How do you balance power between elected city officials and the city manager?

Alejandra “Ale” Chávez: Balancing power between elected officials and the city manager requires clear roles and accountability. Elected officials should focus on setting policies that reflect the will of the community, while the city manager implements those policies effectively. Transparency and communication are key to ensuring that both sides work collaboratively, maintaining a system of checks and balances to serve the best interests of El Paso’s residents.

Monica Reyes: Balancing the roles of elected officials and city administration is vital for effective governance. Clear boundaries allow the council to set direction while the city manager implements policies. Transparent communication is essential to maintain this balance. Public involvement in oversight ensures accountability and keeps both the council and city manager focused on residents’ best interests. This collaborative approach fosters trust and promotes a responsive, effective local government.

The November ballot asks voters whether to revoke the Downtown arena bond. Do we need such a venue? Please explain.

Alejandra “Ale” Chávez: El Paso voters approved the arena bond over a decade ago, and while a venue could benefit the city by attracting events and boosting the local economy, we must ensure it aligns with the current needs and priorities of our community. Any decision should be made with input from residents and based on a clear understanding of how it will impact taxpayers. 

Monica Reyes: At this time, to me, it appears that it is more of a want versus a need. The question of whether El Paso needs a Downtown arena requires careful consideration of its benefits and costs. An arena could boost tourism and local businesses, creating jobs. However, we must consider the financial burden on taxpayers and the city budget. If elected, I would assess the economic impact and continue to engage the community. We must ensure the benefits outweigh the costs and that it doesn’t displace residents or businesses. 

The city has long struggled with how to prioritize and fund street repairs. How would you address this challenge and pay for it?

Alejandra “Ale” Chávez: To address this challenge, we need a data-driven approach that prioritizes repairs based on the streets’ condition, traffic volume, and safety concerns. I would also explore reallocating existing resources, cutting waste, and potentially adjusting budget priorities to focus more on infrastructure needs. Taxpayers deserve to see their money used effectively, so transparency and accountability in how we fund street repairs are essential.

Monica Reyes: Fixing our streets requires a smart, long-term strategy. First, we must use data to prioritize repairs based on safety, traffic, and impact. Second, invest in proactive maintenance like resurfacing, which extends road lifespan and saves money. Third, seek diverse funding, including grants and partnerships to reduce taxpayer burden. Lastly, ensure transparency and public input on priorities. This approach makes streets safer and more reliable without overburdening the budget.

What is the top priority specific to your district and how would you address it?

Alejandra “Ale” Chávez: The top priority for District 1 is addressing traffic flow and infrastructure issues, particularly the delayed Resler Connect project. I will push for immediate action on these critical projects to improve safety and reduce congestion. Traffic flow concerns on Frontera and Country Club Roads also need urgent attention to prevent further congestion. By working with residents and city officials, we can ensure these improvements meet the community’s needs.

Monica Reyes: The top priority in my district is improving infrastructure with community engagement. Many areas suffer from outdated infrastructure, unsafe roads, and neglected public spaces, affecting quality of life and economic growth. I will prioritize critical repairs to enhance safety, mobility, and public spaces, engage residents in planning, and seek diverse funding sources to reduce reliance on local taxes. This will create safer neighborhoods and foster economic development